Serie de casos de sangrado intraluminal postoperatorio en colectomía izquierda / Case series of postoperative intraluminal bleeding in left colectomy

Introducción: El sangrado digestivo intraluminal postoperatorio es una entidad poco frecuente y su manifestación clínica no difiere de la hemorragia digestiva baja de otra etiología. A pesar de que su presentación más habitual es la hematoquecia autolimitada en la primera deposición, en un discreto porcentaje puede requerir transfusiones, tratamiento endoscópico, hemodinámico, o incluso cirugía. Objetivo: Analizar los pacientes con sangrado digestivo intraluminal postoperatorio tratados en un centro de alta complejidad y realizar una revisión bibliográfica del tema. Diseño: Estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo. Material y métodos: Pacientes con sangrado anastomótico durante el post operatorio inmediato de una colectomía izquierda, operados en el Servicio de Cirugía General y Coloproctología desde enero del 2017 a diciembre del 2021. Las variables estudiadas fueron edad, sexo, anticoagulación y su causa, descenso de hemoglobina, cirugía realizada y su indicación, vía de abordaje, configuración de la anastomosis, electividad de la cirugía, complicaciones, días de internación y manejo terapéutico. Resultados: Se incluyeron 4 pacientes con una edad media de 72 (rango 54-87) años y una distribución por sexo de 1:1. En todos la colectomía izquierda fue programada y en 3 el abordaje fue laparoscópico. La anastomosis fue termino-terminal con sutura mecánica circular. Todos los pacientes presentaron sangrado en las primeras 24 horas postoperatorias. El tratamiento fue decidido de acuerdo a la condición hemodinámica: en los 2 pacientes con estabilidad hemodinámica fue suficiente el tratamiento conservador con reanimación y transfusiones. Los otros 2 que presentaron inestabilidad hemodinámica requirieron manejo intervencionista con endoscopía rígida, videocolonoscopía y cirugía. Conclusión: El sangrado intraluminal es una complicación poco frecuente de la anastomosis colorrectal que requiere manejo intervencionista solo en los pacientes que presentan inestabilidad hemodinámica. (AU)

Introduction: Postoperative intraluminal gastrointestinal bleeding is a rare entity and its clinical manifestation does not differ from lower gastro-intestinal bleeding of another etiology. Despite the fact that its most common presentation is self-limited hematochezia at the first stool, in a small percentage it may require transfusions, endoscopic or hemodynamic management, or even surgery. Aim: To analyze the patients with postoperative intraluminal gastrointestinal bleeding treated in a tertiary center and to carry out a bibliographic review of the subject. Design: Retrospective descriptive study. Material and methods: Patients with immediate postoperative anastomotic bleeding from a left colectomy, operated on at the General Surgery and Coloproctology Service from January 2017 to December 2021 were included. The variables recorded were age, sex, anticoagulation and its cause, decrease in hemoglobin, procedure performed and its indication, surgical approach, type of anastomosis, electiveness of surgery, complications, hospital stay and management. Results: Four patients with a mean age of 72 (range 54-87) years and a 1:1 gender distribution were included. All procedures were elective and 3 laparoscopic. All anastomoses were performed end-to-end with a circular stapler. All patients presented bleeding in the first 24 postoperative hours. The treatment was decided according to the hemodynamic condition; patients with hemodynamic stability (2) received medical treatment while those with hemodynamic instability (2) required interventional management with rigid endoscopy, colonoscopy and surgery. Conclusion: Intraluminal bleeding is a rare complication of colorectal anastomosis that requires interventional management only in patients with hemodynamic instability. (AU)

Proteína C reactiva y su relación con las complicaciones posoperatorias en cirugía colorrectal electiva / Association between C-reactive protein and postoperative complications in elective colorectal surgery

RESUMEN Antecedentes: el uso de la proteína C reactiva (PCR) ha adquirido relevancia como identificador de complicaciones posoperatorias La morbilidad en cirugía colorrectal se estima en un 30% de los pacientes operados, lo que demanda medidas para su temprana identificación y terapéutica. Objetivo: describir las curvas de mediciones sucesivas de PCR y su relación con el desarrollo de complicaciones posoperatorias y niveles de glóbulos blancos en una serie de pacientes operados de cirugía colorrectal. Materiales y métodos: se realizó una revisión retrospectiva sobre un registro prospectivo de 2205 pacientes operados por la División de Cirugía Gastroenterológica del Hospital de Clínicas, entre enero de 2019 y julio de 2020. Se incluyeron 69 pacientes que cumplieron con los criterios de selección. Se consignaron datos del seguimiento clínico y dosaje de PCR, recuento de glóbulos blancos, vía de abordaje y desarrollo de complicaciones. Resultados: el promedio de edad fue de 59 años (DS 13,6; rango 33-85), 31 fueron hombres (43%). La tasa de complicaciones fue del 13,04%; más frecuente fue la fístula anastomótica (fístula, colección), seguida por complicaciones de la herida (hematoma, evisceración). Todos los pacientes mostraron un ascenso inicial del valor de PCR entre el 2° y 3er día, en relación con la lesión quirúrgica, los no complicados presentaron una cinética de descenso y los complicados. curvas de segundo ascenso o no descenso en las mediciones seriadas de PCR, y exhibían valores superiores de PCR cada día Se advirtieron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre los valores de proteína C reactiva al 5° día posoperatorio en el subgrupo de pacientes complicados con respecto a aquellos con un curso indolente (28 mg/dL vs. 6,1 mg/dL, p < 0,001; IC: 11,24-39,61). hubo diferencia significativa al 5o día entre complicados y no complicados, independientemente de la vía de abordaje. con un valor de corte de PCR de 10,92 mg/dL obtuvimos una sensibilidad del 87,50% y una especificidad del 100% para excluir complicaciones. Conclusiones: la medición de la proteína C reactiva de forma seriada en los posoperatorios de cirugía colorrectal mostró un correlato con la identificación temprana de las complicaciones en nuestra serie, tanto en sus valores absolutos diarios como en la cinética de su comportamiento. se formula el uso de valores de corte para el alta segura.

ABSTRACT Background: The use of C-reactive protein (CRP) has gained relevance as a marker of marker of postoperative complications. As the incidence of complications of colorectal surgery is estimated to be of 30%, measures should for their early identification and treatment. Objective: To describe the performance of consecutive CRP determinations and their relationship with the development of postoperative complications and with white blood cell count in a series of patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Materials and methods: A retrospective review was performed using a prospective registry of 2205 patients operated on at the Department of Digestive Surgery of Hospital de Clínicas, between January 2019 and July 2020. A total of 69 patients fulfilling the selection criteria were included. Clinical follow-up data, CRP levels, white blood cell count, type of approach and development of complications were recorded. Results: Mean age was 59 years (SD 13.6; range 33-85) and 31 were men (43%). The complication rate was 13.04%. Anastomotic leak (fistula, fluid collection) was the most common complication, followed by surgical site complications (hematoma, evisceration). All patients showed an initial increase in CRP values between days 2 and 3, in relation with the surgical lesion, and then decreased in those without complications. Patients with complications had second rise or lack of decrease in serial CRP measurements, and higher CRP values each day. There were statistically significant differences between the CRP levels on postoperative day 5 in the subgroup of patients with complications compared with those with an indolent course (28 mg/dL vs. 6.1 mg/dL, p < 0.001; CI: 11.24-39.61). There was a significant difference on day 5 between patients with and without complications, irrespective of the approach. With a cut-off value of CRP of 10.92 mg/dL on postoperative day 5 we obtained a sensitivity of 87.50% and specificity of 100% to rule out complications. Conclusions: Serial determination of CRP in the postoperative period after colorectal surgery was associated with early identification of complications in our series, both in daily absolute values and in the kinetics of its performance. The use of cut-off values for safe discharge is proposed.

Risk factors for anastomotic leakage following total or subtotal colectomy

Introduction: A higher rate of anastomotic leakage (AL) is reported after ileosigmoid anastomosis (ISA) or ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) in total or subtotal colectomy (TSC) compared with colonic or colorectal anastomosis. Themain aimof the present studywas to assess potential risk factors for AL after ISA or IRA and to investigate determinants of morbidity. Methods: We identified 180 consecutive patients in a prospective referral, single center database, in which 83 of the patients underwent TSC with ISA or IRA. Data regarding the clinical characteristics, surgical treatment, and outcome were assessed to determine their association with the cumulative incidence of AL and surgical morbidity. Results: Ileosigmoid anastomosis was performed in 51 of the patients (61.5%) and IRA in 32 patients (38.6%). The cumulative incidence of ALwas 15.6% (13 of 83 patients). A higher AL rate was found in patients under 50 years-old (p=0.038), in the electivelaparoscopic approach subgroup (p=0.049), and patients in the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) subgroup (p=0.009). Furthermore, 14 patients (16.9%) had morbidity classified as Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIA. Discussion: A relatively high incidence of AL after TSC was observed in a relatively safe surgical procedure. Our findings suggest that the risk of AL may be higher in IBD patients. According to our results, identifying risk factors prior to surgerymay improve short-term outcomes. (AU)

Sarcopenia como factor predictivo de dehiscencia de anastomosis en pacientes operados de cáncer de colon / Predictive value of sarcopenia for anastomotic dehiscense in colon cancer surgery

Resumen Introducción: Una complicación importante de la cirugía colorrectal es la dehiscencia de anastomosis (DA). El estado nutricional es uno de los factores importantes en la DA. Una forma objetiva para evaluar nutricionalmente a los pacientes es medir la sarcopenia, definida como disminución de masa muscular esquelética, que puede ser objetivada por análisis de Unidades Hounsfield (UH) y área muscular (AM) por medio de Tomografía Computarizada de Abdomen y Pelvis (TCAP). Objetivo: Evaluar si existe relación entre la DA y la presencia de sarcopenia detectada por medición de UH y AM en TCAP en pacientes sometidos a colectomía por cáncer. Materiales y Método: Estudio de casos y controles con estadística analítica. Se eligen de manera aleatoria 21 pacientes con DA y 40 sin DA. Se incluyen > 18 años, con colectomía por cáncer y anastomosis primaria. Fueron excluidos pacientes ostomizados, que no tuvieran TCAP preoperatoria o que éste no permitiera medir UH y AM. La evaluación imagenológica fue realizada por radiólogo experto. Resultados: La comparación entre grupos evidencia que son homogéneos con respecto al sexo (predomino hombres), edad (promedio 60 años) y localización. Se evidencia signos imagenológicos sugerentes de sarcopenia en el grupo de DA, puesto que existe disminución en UH con valores estadísticamente significativos y tendencia a presentar valores menores en el AM. Conclusiones: La presencia de sarcopenia evaluada por alteración de UH en estudio radiológico se correlaciona con DA, pudiendo ser un predictor de riesgo. La importancia de este hallazgo es que es un factor de riesgo potencialmente corregible.

Introduction: An important complication of colorectal surgery is anastomotic dehiscence (AD). Nutritional status is one of the important factors in AD. An objective way to evaluate the patients' nutritional status is to measure sarcopenia, which is the reduction of skeletal muscle mass. It is possible to standardize Sarcopenia using the analysis of the Hounsfield Units (HU) and the muscular area (MA) which consider Computed Tomography of Abdomen and Pelvis (CTAP). Aim: To evaluate whether there is a relationship between AD and the presence of sarcopenia detected by the measurement of HU and MA using CTAP. The situation considers patients undergoing colectomy for cancer. Materials and Method: Cases and controls were studied with analytical statistics. 21 patients with AD and 40 without AD were chosen randomly. They include > 18 years, with colectomy for cancer and primary anastomosis. Ostomized patients, who previous the surgery do not have CTAP or if it was not available to measure HU and MA, were excluded. The imaging evaluation was performed by an expert radiologist. Results: The comparison between groups shows that they are homogeneous with respect the sex (predominant men), age (average 60 years) and location. There are signs of imaging which suggest the presence of sarcopenia in the AD group. This is explained because there is an important statistical decrease in the HU values and a tendency to present lower MA values. Conclusions: The presence of sarcopenia due to alteration of HU in a radiological study is correlated with AD, and could be a predictor of risk. The importance of this finding is that this risk factor is potentially correctable.

Mobilização da flexura esplênica nas ressecções dos tumores de reto e sigmoide: meta-análise dos resultados cirúrgicos / Splenic flexure mobilization in sigmoid and rectal cancer resections: a meta-analysis of surgical outcomes

RESUMO Objetivo: avaliar a influência da mobilização da flexura esplênica nos principais resultados cirúrgicos de pacientes submetidos à ressecção de câncer do cólon sigmoide ou reto. Métodos: os bancos de dados MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register de Ensaios Controlados e LILACS foram pesquisados usando os termos "mobilização da flexura esplênica", "cirurgia colorretal", "câncer retal", "ressecção anterior", "câncer de cólon sigmoide", "ressecção de sigmoide". O desfecho principal foi a deiscência da anastomose. Outros desfechos analisados foram mortalidade, sangramento, infecção e complicações gerais. Os tamanhos dos efeitos foram estimados por meio do agrupamento dos dados de seis estudos de caso-controle (1.433 pacientes) publicados até janeiro de 2018. Resultados: nossa meta-análise revelou que pacientes submetidos à mobilização completa da flexura esplênica tinham um risco maior de deiscência anastomótica (RR=2,27, IC95%: 1,22-4,23) em comparação àqueles não submetidos a esse procedimento. Nenhuma diferença pôde ser demonstrada entre os grupos em termos de mortalidade, sangramento, infecção e complicações gerais. Conclusão: a mobilização da flexura esplênica está associada a um maior risco de deiscência anastomótica nas ressecções de câncer de reto ou cólon sigmoide. Esta manobra cirúrgica deve ser utilizada com cautela no manejo cirúrgico dos tumores colorretais.

ABSTRACT Objective: to evaluate the influence of the splenic flexure mobilization for the main surgical outcomes of patients submitted to resection of sigmoid and rectal cancer. Methods: we searched the MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and LILACS, using the terms "splenic flexure mobilization", "colorectal surgery", "rectal cancer", "anterior resection", "sigmoid colon cancer", and "sigmoid resection". The main outcome was anastomotic dehiscence. Other outcomes analyzed were mortality, bleeding, infection and general complications. We estimated the effect sizes by grouping data from six case-control studies (1,433 patients) published until January 2018. Results: our meta-analysis showed that patients undergoing complete mobilization of the splenic flexure had a higher risk of anastomotic dehiscence (RR=2.27, 95%CI: 1.22-4.23) compared with those not submitted to this procedure. There was no difference between the groups in terms of mortality, bleeding, infection and general complications. Conclusion: splenic flexure mobilization is associated with a higher risk of anastomotic dehiscence in resections of sigmoid and rectal cancer. This surgical maneuver should be used with caution in the surgical management of sigmoid or rectal cancers.

Late impact of the laparoscopic treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis with segmental colorectal resection / Impacto tardio do tratamento laparoscópico da endometriose profunda infiltrativa com ressecção segmentar colorretal

ABSTRACT Background: Deep infiltrating colorectal endometriosis may severely affect the quality of life and fertility of patients. Although segmental resection is a therapeutic option that provides positive outcomes in the management of symptoms, its functional effects are still unproven. Aim: Assess the late impact of the laparoscopic approach in treating deep infiltrating endometriosis with segmental colorectal resection. Methods: Prospective case series of 46 patients submitted to laparoscopic treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis with segmental colorectal resection between 2013 and 2016. Fertility, gynecological and bowel symptoms were assessed at the preoperative period and at three and 12 months (or more) after the procedure. Results: Preoperative interview assessed the prevalence of infertility (45.6%), gynecological (87%) and intestinal (80.4%) symptoms. At the third month after the procedure a significant reduction in the prevalence of gynecological symptoms (p<0,001), tenesmus (p=0,001) and dysquesia (p=0,002) was observed. After a period of 12 months or more following the procedure a significant reduction in the prevalence persisted for dysmenorrhea (p=0,001), deep dyspareunia (p=0,041), chronic pelvic pain (p=0,011) and dysquesia (p=0,001), as compared to the preoperative period. Total pregnancy rate was 57.1% and spontaneous pregnancy 47.6%. Conclusion: The treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis using segmental colorectal resection has provided early and late relief of gynecological and bowel symptoms. The outcomes also indicate a positive impact on the fertility of infertile patients.

RESUMO Racional: A endometriose profunda infiltrativa colorretal pode impactar de maneira importante na qualidade de vida e na fertilidade das pacientes. A ressecção segmentar é uma opção terapêutica com resultados positivos na queda dos sintomas, porém ainda sem efeitos funcionais comprovados. Objetivo: Avaliar o impacto tardio do tratamento laparoscópico da endometriose profunda infiltrativa com ressecção segmentar colorretal. Métodos: Série de casos prospectiva com 46 pacientes submetidas ao tratamento laparoscópico para endometriose profunda infiltrativa com ressecção segmentar colorretal entre 2013 e 2016. Foram analisados sintomas ginecológicos, intestinais e a fertilidade no período pré-operatório, três e 12 meses ou mais após o procedimento. Resultados: Na entrevista pré-operatória, foram levantadas as prevalências de sintomas ginecológicos (87%), intestinais (80,4%) e de infertilidade (45,6%). No 3º mês pós-operatório, observou-se redução significativa da prevalência dos sintomas ginecológicos (p<0,001) e de sintomas intestinais, tenesmo (p=0,001) e disquesia (p=0,002). Após 12 meses ou mais observou-se diminuição significativa da prevalência de dismenorreia (p=0,001), de dispareunia profunda (p=0,041) e de dor pélvica crônica (p=0,011) além de disquesia (p=0,001) em relação ao período pré-operatório. As taxas de gravidez total e espontânea foram de 57,1% e 47,6%, respectivamente. Conclusão: O tratamento da endometriose profunda infiltrativa com ressecção segmentar colorretal proporcionou alívio precoce e tardio dos sintomas ginecológicos e intestinais. Os resultados sugerem impacto positivo sobre a fertilidade em pacientes inférteis.

Análisis de variables relacionadas con la morbimortalidad de la anastomosis ileocólica después de hemicolectomía derecha / Analysis of variables related to morbidity and mortality of the ileocolic anastomosis after right hemicolectomy

Introducción: La hemicolectomía derecha con anastomosis ileocólica es una cirugía frecuentemente realizada para la que existen muchas formas de realizarla. Objetivo: Evaluar cuál es la mejor anastomosis ilecólica en términos de morbimortalidad y realizar una evaluación comparativa de la evolución clínica posoperatoria según el tipo de configuración anastomótica. Pacientes y Método: Estudio observacional analítico, con criterios de inclusión y exclusión definidos. Las variables a estudiar las dividimos en dos grupos, las relacionadas a la técnica quirúrgica y su configuración anastomótica, y las variables relacionadas con resultados de la intervención quirúrgica, creando una tabla de contingencia en que se cruzan los datos. Análisis de datos con STATA 13.0. Resultados: 216 pacientes con anastomosis ileocólica, destacando significancia estadística al cruzar: A) reoperación y tipo de sutura (p = 0,044), con un OR 3,4 (IC 95% 0,94-18,6), siendo de mayor riesgo la mecánica; B) mortalidad y urgencia (p = 0,001) con un OR 7,76 (IC 95% 1,56-49,29), siendo de mayor riesgo la cirugía de urgencia. Las anastomosis isoperistálticas possen eliminación de gases (p < 0,001), tránsito intestinal (p = 0,009) e ingesta de sólidos (p = 0,005) más precoz. Hay expulsión de gases antes en el abordaje laparoscópico, sutura manual, configuración término lateral e isoperistáltica de la anastomosis y cirugía electiva. Conclusión: Existe gran variabilidad de técnicas para realizar la anastomosis ileocólica. La anastomosis manual muestra menor probabilidad de necesitar una reintervención quirúrgica, la cirugía electiva tiene menor mortalidad que la realizada de urgencia. Sugerimos realizarla vía laparoscópica, con sutura manual, término lateral, isoperistáltica y de forma electiva, por tener una recuperación más corta.

Introduction: Right hemicolectomy with ileocolic anastomosis is a frequent surgery with many ways to perform it. Objective: To evaluate which is the best ileocolic anastomosis in terms of morbidity and mortality and to make a comparative evaluation of the postoperative clinical evolution according to the type of anastomosis. Patients and Method: Analytical observational study, with defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The variables to be studied are divided into two groups, those related to the surgical technique and its anastomotic configuration, and the variables related to the results of the surgical intervention, creating a contingency table that crosses the data. Data analysis with STATA 13.0. Results: 216 patients with ileocolic anastomosis, highlighting statistical significance when crossing: A) reoperation and type of suture (p = 0.044), with UN or 3.4 (95% CI 0.94 to 18.6), being of greater risk the mechanics; B) mortality and urgency (p = 0.001) with an OR 7.76 (95% CI 1.56-49.29), with emergency surgery being of greater risk. Isoperistaltic anastomosis with gas elimination (p < 0.001), intestinal transit (p = 0.009) and solid intake (p = 0.005) earlier. There is earlier expulsion of gases in the laparoscopic approach, manual suture, end-to-side and isoperistaltic of the anastomosis and elective surgery. Conclusion: There is great variability of techniques to perform the ileocolic anastomosis. Manual anastomosis is less likely to require surgical reoperation, elective surgery has a lower mortality than that of emergency surgery. We suggest performing it laparoscopically, with manual suture, lateral term, isoperistaltic and electively, for having a shorter recovery.

Se justifica el seguimiento después de una colectomía en pacientes con poliposis adenomatosa familiar / The follow up after colectomy in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis is justified

phenotypic expression is the presence of múltiple colorectal adenomatous polyps (more than 100), with high probability developing colorrectal cancer (CRC) before the fifth decade of life. Prophylactic surgery (total colectomy or restorative proctocolectomy) reduces the risk of developing CRC. However, the risk of developing tumors in other organs remains present. Objetive: Analyze the frequency and type of tumors associated with classic familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome (FAPc) patients undergoing prophylactic colectomy. Material and Methods: Cohort study. From the registry of hereditary colorrectal cancer (CRC) at our institution, we identified patients with FAPc who underwent total colectomy with ileorrectal anastomosis (TC-IRA) or restorative proctocolectomy (RTPC), from 1999 to 2014. In the follow-up we analyzed related tumors and mortality. Results: 27 patients, of whom 18 (66.7%) underwent TC-IRA and 9 (33.3%) underwent RTPC. At the time of surgery, 4 patients had CRC (15%) and 5 had extracolonic tumors (osteomas). In a mean follow-up of 49, 4 months (i: 2 y 178) the following lesions were diagnosed: digestive tract adenomas in 17 (63%) patients, of these 2 required a proctectomy and 3 resection of duodenal adenomas. Eight patients developed desmoid tumors (30%), and 3 of them underwent surgery. One patient had an extradigestive tumor (thyroid cancer) and only 8/27 (29.6%) did not develop other tumors. One patient died due to progression of his CCR. Discussion: In this series it is confirmed that most patients will develop neoplasms FAPc after colectomy. conclusion: The removal of the colon and/or rectum is able to prevent the development of CRC. However, two thirds of the patients develop other tumors in which systematic surveillance allowed early detection and treatment.

Objetivo: Analizar la frecuencia y tipo de tumores asociados en pacientes con poliposis adenomatosa familiar clásica (PAFc) sometidos a una colectomía profiláctica. Materiales y Métodos: Estudio de cohorte. Desde el registro de cáncer colorrectal (CCR) hereditario, se identificaron las familias con PAFc, y de estas a los pacientes que se les practicó una colectomía total con anastomosis íleorrectal (CT-AIR) o proctocolec-tomía restauradora (PCTR), desde 1999 al 2014. En el seguimiento se analizaron los tumores asociados y su mortalidad. Resultados: Se identificaron 27 pacientes, de los cuales 18 (66,7%) fueron sometidos a CT-AIR y 9 (33,3%) a PCTR. Al momento de la cirugía, 4 pacientes presentaban CCR (15%) y 5 tenían tumores extracolónicos (osteomas). En un seguimiento promedio de 49,4 meses (i: 2 y 178) se diagnosticaron: adenomas del tracto digestivo en 17 (63%) pacientes, de éstos 2 requirieron una proctectomía y 3 resecciones de adenomas duodenales. Ocho pacientes desarrollaron tumores desmoides (30%), y 3 de ellos fueron sometidos a una cirugía. Un paciente presentó un tumor extradigestivo (cáncer de tiroides) y sólo 8/27 (29,6%) pacientes no desarrollaron otros tumores. Un paciente falleció por progresión de su CCR. Discusión: En esta serie se confirma que la mayoría de los pacientes con PAFc seguirán desarrollando neoplasias después de su colectomía. conclusiones: La extirpación del colon y/o recto permitió evitar el desarrollo de CCR. Sin embargo, dos tercios de los pacientes presentaron otros tumores en quienes su seguimiento permitió una detección y tratamiento temprano.

Pancreatitis post quirúrgica: una entidad clínica para recordar / Postoperative pancreatitis: a clinical entity to remember

Postoperative pancreatitis is a rare entity characterized by the presence of clinical and imagenological pancreatic inflammation after surgery of the near or far gastrointestinal tract. The cause is probably multifactorial, with no preventive measures. Diagnostic dilemma and morbidity and mortality associated with this condition makes this case interesting. We describe the case of a 65 years old female presenting acute pancreatitis attributed to surgery performed 3 days before to resolve intestinal obstruction.

La pancreatitis post-cirugía es una entidad poco frecuente caracterizada por la presencia clínica e imagenológica de inflamación del páncreas luego de una cirugía del tracto gastrointestinal. La causa es probablemente multifactorial, y no existen medidas preventivas. El dilema del diagnóstico y la morbi-mortalidad asociadas a esta condición hace que este caso sea muy interesante. Describimos el caso de un sujeto de sexo femenino de 65 años, con pancreatitis aguda atribuida a una cirugía realizada 3 días antes con el objetivo de resolver una obstrucción intestinal.

Laparoscopic training in colorectal surgery: can we do it safely? / Colectomia videolaparoscópica: é seguro treinar o residente?

OBJECTIVE: Laparoscopic approach should be offered for most patients requiring colectomy, as it is a safe procedure, associated with shorter hospitalization, better cosmetic results, and does not affect negatively the oncological outcomes of patients with colon cancer. However, there is no consistent data on the safety of laparoscopic surgery training during residency. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess whether or not the resident participation in laparoscopic colectomy affected the postoperative outcomes. METHODS: The database of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) was searched for patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomies between 2005 and 2007. We excluded patients with no data regarding whether or not there was a resident participation in the operation. The study population was divided into 2 groups (resident and nonresident), according to residents participation in the surgical procedure. Perioperative variables and postoperative complications were compared between groups. A multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the association between postoperative complications and resident participation in the operation. RESULTS: The search yielded 5,912 patients with a median age of 63 years. Of these, 3,112 (53%) were female and 3.887 (66%) had a resident involved in their operation. The resident group had a significantly longer mean operative time (163 ± 64 min vs 138 ± 58 min, p < 0.0001). Other variables did not differ significantly between groups. Moreover, multivariate analysis showed no association between resident participation and the occurrence of postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic training during residency may be safely performed without threatening the patient's integrity. (AU)

OBJETIVO: Cirurgia videolaparoscópica é a via preferencial para colectomias eletivas por ser um procedimento seguro, associado à menor tempo de internação, melhores resultados estéticos e por não influenciar negativamente os resultados oncológicos dos pacientes com câncer de cólon. Entretanto, ainda não existem dados consistentes sobre a segurança do treinamento em cirurgia laparoscópica durante a residência. Sendo assim, o objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar se a participação do residente em colectomias laparoscópicas afetou os resultados pós-operatórios. MÉTODOS: A base de dados do American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) foi pesquisada para colectomias laparoscópicas entre os anos de 2005 e 2007. A população do estudo foi dividida em dois grupos de acordo com a participação ou não do residente na cirurgia: residente vs. não residente. Os grupos foram comparados em relação às variáveis perioperatórias e complicações pós-operatórias. Uma análise multivariada foi realizada para investigar possível associação entre complicações pós-operatórias e o envolvimento de residentes na operação. A pesquisa retornou 5.912 pacientes, com mediana de idade de 63 anos. Em 3.887 casos (66%) o residente estava envolvido na operação. O grupo Residente apresentou tempo operatório mediano significantemente maior que o grupo Não Residente (163 ± 64 min vs. 138 ± 58 min, p < 0.0001). Todas as outras variáveis estudadas não diferiram significativamente entre os grupos. Além disso, a análise multivariada não demonstrou nenhuma associação entre o envolvimento do residente na operação e a ocorrência de complicações pós-operatórias. CONCLUSÃO: O treinamento laparoscópico durante a residência pode ser realizado com segurança sem colocar em risco a integridade do paciente operado. (AU)

Inflammatory and Tumor Stimulating Responses after Laparoscopic Sigmoidectomy

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic colectomy has clinical benefits such as short hospital stay, less postoperative pain, and early return of bowel function. However, objective evidence of its immunologic and oncologic benefits is scarce. We compared functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic sigmoidectomy and investigated the effect of open versus laparoscopic surgery on acute inflammation as well as tumor stimulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 57 patients who were diagnosed with sigmoid colon cancer were randomized for elective conventional or laparoscopically assisted sigmoidectomy. Serum samples were obtained preoperatively and on postoperative day 1. C-reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-6 (IL-6) were measured as inflammation markers, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) were used as tumor stimulation factors. Clinical parameters and serum markers were compared. RESULTS: Postoperative hospital stay (p=0.031), the first day of gas out (p=0.016), and the first day of soft diet (p<0.001) were significantly shorter for the laparoscopic surgery group than the open surgery group. The levels of CRP, IL-6, and VEGF rose significantly, and the concentration of IGFBP-3 fell significantly after both open and laparoscopic surgery. However, there were no significant differences in the preoperative and postoperative levels of CRP, IL-6, VEGF, and IGFBP-3 between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that both open and laparoscopic surgeries are accompanied by significant changes in IL-6, CRP, IGFBP-3, and VEGF levels. Acute inflammation markers and tumor stimulating factors may not reflect clinical benefits of laparoscopic surgery.

Factores predictivos de conversión en la sigmoidectomía laparoscópica para el tratamiento de la enfermedad diverticular / Predictive factors of conversion in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy in patients with diverticular disease

Laparoscopic surgery diminihes the morbidity of colorrectal surgery. These benefits are lost if the surgery is converted to an open procedure. We searched for predictive factors of conversión in patients with diverticular disease. A study of 79 patients who underwent laparoscopic sigmoid resection was performed, comparing those who underwent conversión and those who didn't. Material and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was done in a third level hospital of the patients who required laparoscopic sigmoidectomy during the last 7 years. Analysis: The t Student, test and the exact Fisher test were used. We considered p < 0.05 (95 percent confidence interval) as statistically significant. Results: The pre operative variables of age, sex, BMI, ASA, previous abdominal surgery, complicated or uncomplicated diverticulitis, and type of surgery were considered. Post operative variables considered were operative time, bleeding, return of bowel function, and hospital stay. No factor was identified as predictive of conversión. There was a statistically significant difference between both groups when surgical time (p = 0.0030) and operative bleeding (p = 0.0272) were compared. Conclusions: We failed to identify a single factor predictive of conversión to an open procedure. We think it is more probable that a confluence of different variables lead to this result. The patients in whom the conversión was performed had more bleeding and prolonged surgical times, which makes them more prone to post operative complications.

La laparoscopia disminuye la morbilidad de la cirugía colorrectal. Estos beneficios se pierden con la conversión. Buscamos factores predictivos de conversión en pacientes con enfermedad diverticular. Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo de 79 pacientes en quienes se realizó sigmoidectomía laparoscópica y se comparó los pacientes que requirieron conversión y los que no. Material y Métodos: Se hizo un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo en un hospital de tercer nivel de los pacientes a los que se realizó sigmoidectomía laparoscópica. Análisis: Se utilizó las pruebas t de Student y prueba exacta de Fisher. Se tomó como estadísticamente significativo un valor de p < 0,05 (intervalo de confianza 95 por ciento). Resultados: Se valoraron las variables pre operatorias de edad, sexo, IMC, clasificación ASA, cirugía abdominal previa, diverticulitis complicada o no complicada y tipo de cirugía. Variables post operatorias que se consideraron fueron tiempo quirúrgico, sangrado intra operatorio, retorno a función intestinal y estancia hospitalaria. No se identificó ningún factor predictivo de conversión. Si hubo diferencia estadísticamente significativa entre ambos grupos en cuanto al tiempo quirúrgico (p = 0,0030) y al sangrado intra operatorio (p = 0,0272). Conclusiones: No identificamos ningún factor predictivo de conversión en el tratamiento de la enfermedad diverticular por laparoscopia. Creemos que no hay un factor único que pueda ser utilizado para esto, más bien, es la confluencia de ciertas variables lo que conlleva a este resultado. Los pacientes en los que se realizó la conversión tienen mayor sangrado y tiempo quirúrgico, lo que pudiera hacer que sean más propicios a tener complicaciones post operatorias.

Resultados de la cirugía laparoscópica en el tratamiento electivo de la enfermedad diverticular de colon / Results of laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of diverticular disease of the colon

The laparoscopic approach is an alternative for the elective treatment of diverticular colon disease (DCD). Aim: To analyze the results of patients electively operated for DCD using a laparoscopic technique. Material and Methods: Data of patients with DCD operated using laparoscopy at the Catholic University of Chile Clinical Hospital were prospectively recorded from January 1999 to August 2006. Indications for surgery were repetitive crises of acute diverticulitis, the persistence of the symptoms or anatomic deformity after the first crisis and complicated diverticulitis (Hinchey 1-2) that responded to the medical treatment. The laparoscopic technique used five ports and the surgical specimen was extracted through a suprapubic approach. Results: One hundred and six patients aged 32 to 82 years (49 percent females) were operated in the study period. Fifty five percent had a previous abdominal surgery. The mean operative time was 213 minutes (range: 135-360). Four patients were converted to open surgery (3.7 percent). One or more early post-operative complications were observed in five patients (4.7 percent). The mean time for passing gases and reinitiate liquid diet was 1.7 and 2.4 days respectively. The median post operative stay after surgery was 4 days. There was no operative mortality. Mean follow-up time was 27 months and only one patient (0.9 percent) had a new episode of acute diverticular disease, with a satisfactory response to medical treatment. No patient has developed bowel obstruction. Conclusions: The laparoscopic approach is a safe alternative in the elective surgical treatment of DCD.

Surgical treatment of Chagas megacolon. Critical analysis of outcome in operative methods / Tratamento cirúrgico do megacólon chagásico análise crítica dos resultados dos métodos operatórios

PURPOSE: Surgical treatment of chagasic megacolon has suffered innumerable transformations over the years. Poor knowledge of the disease physiopathology is one of the reasons. METHODS: From January 1977 to December 2003, 430 patients were submitted to surgical treatment for chagasic megacolon. Of these procedures, 351 were elective and 79 emergency operations carried out at the University Hospital of Ribeirão Preto. Four elective operations, most frequently used, should be singled out: anterior rectosigmoidectomy (52.71 percent), left hemicolectomy (18.23 percent), Duhamel-Haddad operation(15.95 percent), and total colectomy (5.98 percent). From the 79 exploratory laparotomies performed on an emergency basis, 53 (67.09 percent) required intestinal resection. From the 430 patients operated upon, 268 (62.33 percent) progressed without recurrence of intestinal constipation, and 71 (15.51 percent) had a recurrence. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Based on the data collected, left hemicolectomy had the highest constipation recurrence rate compared to other operating procedures; anterior retosigmoidectomy had less complication episodes and a larger recurrence of intestinal constipation in comparison to the Duhamel-Haddad operation. Emergency operations, mainly for the treatment of volvulus and fecaloma, presented high morbidity and mortality and required extensive intestinal resections, stomas and reoperations.

INTRODUÇÃO: O tratamento cirúrgico do megacólon chagásico tem passado por sucessivas modificações ao longo do tempo. A multiplicidade das operações é explicada pelo conhecimento ainda incompleto da fisiopatologia da doença, MÉTODOS: No período de janeiro de 1977 a dezembro de 2003, 430 pacientes chagásicos foram submetidos a tratamento cirúrgico para o megacólon no Hospital das Clínicas de Ribeirão Preto. Foram realizadas 351 operações eletivas e 79 de urgência. Quatro tipos de operações realizadas em caráter eletivo mereceram destaque por terem sido as mais utilizadas: retossigmoidectomia anterior (52,71 por cento), hemicolectomia esquerda (18,23 por cento), abaixamento de cólon à Duhamel-Haddad (15,95 por cento) e colectomia total (5,98 por cento). Das 79 laparotomias exploradoras realizadas em regime de urgência, em 53 (67,09 por cento) houve ressecção intestinal. Dentre os 430 pacientes operados, 268 (62,33 por cento) evoluíram sem recidiva e 71 (16,51 por cento) com recidiva da constipação intestinal. RESULTADOS E DISCUSSÃO: Com base nos resultados obtidos concluiu-se que: a hemicolectomia esquerda, comparada às demais operações, apresentou maior recidiva da constipação intestinal; a retossigmoidectomia anterior comparada à operação de Duhamel-Haddad apresentou menor número de complicações e maior recidiva da constipação intestinal; as operações de urgência para o tratamento do volvo e do fecaloma apresentaram alta morbimortalidade, exigem resseções intestinais, estomas e reoperações.

A Case of Successful Treatment of Stomal Variceal Bleeding with Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt and Coil Embolization

Variceal bleeding from enterostomy site is an unusual complication of portal hypertension. The bleeding, however, is often recurrent and may be fatal. The hemorrhage can be managed with local measures in most patients, but when these fail, surgical interventions or portosystemic shunt may be required. Herein, we report a case in which recurrent bleeding from stomal varices, developed after a colectomy for rectal cancer, was successfully treated by placement of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with coil embolization. Although several treatment options are available for this entity, we consider that TIPS with coil embolization offers minimally invasive and definitive treatment.

Úlceras em megacólons chagásicos operados na urgência e eletivamente / Ulcerations in Chagas' megacolon operated at urgency and electively

RACIONAL: O megacólon é uma doença freqüente no nosso meio e abordado na urgência pelas suas complicações como fecalomas, volvos e perfurações. As úlceras de estases nos megacólons contribuem como prováveis sítios de perfurações OBJETIVO: Comparar as freqüências de úlceras de decúbito em megacólons chagásicos operados na urgência, por volvo e fecaloma, e eletivamente, objetivando melhor conduta cirúrgica na urgência MATERIAL E MÉTODOS: Analisaram-se os laudos de 356 exames anatomopatológicos de ressecções colônicas de pacientes operados por megacólon chagásico na urgência (102 casos; 29 por cento) e eletivamente (254 casos; 71 por cento), no período de 1980 a 2000. As indicações cirúrgicas de urgência foram atribuídas a volvo (71 casos; 69,6 por cento), fecaloma (25 casos; 24,5 por cento), abdome agudo perfurativo após sondagem retal ou sigmoidoscopia (6 casos; 5,9 por cento). Compararam-se as freqüências de úlceras nos dois grupos de peças cirúrgicas, com a utilização do teste do qui-quadrado RESULTADOS: Nos laudos das peças cirúrgicas obtidas nas cirurgias de urgência, constatou-se o registro de úlceras em 26 casos (25,5 por cento); nas peças de ressecções eletivas verificaram-se úlceras em 21 casos (8,25 por cento). A diferença observada foi estatisticamente significante. A comparação dos grupos de volvo, fecaloma e volvo com fecaloma, em separado com o grupo das cirurgias eletivas, evidenciou diferenças significantes em relação ao volvo e ao fecaloma CONCLUSÃO: A freqüência muito maior de úlceras nos megas operados em caráter de urgência enfatiza a necessidade da ressecção imediata do cólon sigmóide, ao invés da conduta conservadora de simples colostomia descompressiva, mesmo naquelas laparotomias exploradoras em que o exame macroscópico do sigmóide não mostre sinais de necrose. Desta forma, deve-se prevenir a ocorrência de perfuração do megacólon no pós-operatório mediato, com conseqüências usualmente graves.

BACKGROUD: The megacolon is a frequent disease in our emergencie hospital, and approached in the urgency by your complications as fecal impaction, volvulus and perforations. The ulcerations in the megacolons contribute as probable sites of perforations AIM: To compare the frequencies of stercoral ulceration in Chagas' megacolon operated at urgency, by volvulus or fecal impaction, and electively, aiming at a better surgical conduct in the urgency surgery METHODS: It was analyzed 356 anatomy-pathological exams from colon resection of operated patients due to Chagas' megacolon at urgency (102 cases; 29 percent) and electively (254 cases; 71 percent), from 1980 to 2000. The surgical urgency indications were attributed to volvulus (71 cases; 69,6 percent), fecal impaction (25 cases; 24,5 percent), perforated acute abdomen after rectal catheter or sigmoidoscopy (6 cases; 5,9 percent). The ulceration frequency was compared in both groups of resections, using chi-square RESULTS: The pathological anatomy - of surgery resection obtained at urgency surgeries, showed 26 cases of ulceration (25,5 percent) and in electively resections were verified 21 cases of ulceration (8,25 percent). The difference observed was statistically significant. The comparison among the groups of volvulus; fecal impaction and volvulus with fecal impaction, separately with electively surgery group evidenced significant differences in relation to volvulus and fecal impaction CONCLUSIONS: The higher frequency of ulcerations in the megacolon operated at urgency character emphasizes the needs of immediate resection of sigmoid colon, instead of conservative conduct of simple decompression colostomy, even in exploration laparotomy which the macroscopic examination of sigmoid does not show necrotic signs. This way, should prevent the occurrence of perforation in megacolon at mediate postoperative, with serious results.

Factibilidad de la colectomía laparoscópica en pacientes obesos / Feasibility of laparoscopic colectomy in obese patients

Antecedentes: Según algunos autores, los pacientes obesos podrían no verse beneficiados con el abordaje laparoscópico de la patología colónica, presentando un mayor número de complicaciones y un índice de conversión más elevado cuando se los compara con la población no obesa. Objetivo: Evaluar los resultados de la cirugía laparoscópica del colon en pacientes obesos y si estos son equiparables a los pacientes no obesos. Diseño: Análisis retrospectivo. Pacientes y Método: Se incluyeron todos los pacientes con patología colorrectal operados por vía laparoscópica. Se excluyeron las cirugías de urgencia, las paliativas y las combinadas. Se dividió la serie en dos grupos. I) Obesos: índice de masa corporal (IMC) > 30. II) No Obesos: IMC < 30. Se analizaron: índice de conversión, morbimortalidad perioperatoria, recuperación y estadía hospitalaria. Para el análisis estadístico se utilizaron el test t de Student y el Chi cuadrado. Resultados: De los 142 pacientes operados, 26 (18,3 por ciento) eran obesos y 116 (81,7 por ciento) no obesos. No se presentaron diferencias significativas entre ambos grupos en cuanto al tiempo operatorio, recuperación, ni morbilidad postoperatoria. El índice de conversión fue: Grupo I: 19 por ciento; Grupo II: 16 por ciento (P = NS) y la estadía hospitalaria de 3 ± 1 días para el Grupo I, y 3,6 ± 2 días para el Grupo II (P = NS). Conclusiones: Los pacientes obesos pueden beneficiarse con el abordaje laparoscópico en la patología colónica con resultados similares a los pacientes no obesos.

Background: Some authors think that obese patients do not obtain benefits with laparoscopic colonic surgery, and that they have more complications and an elevated conversion rate, when compare with non-obese patients. Aim: To evaluate the results of laparoscopic colon surgery in obese patients and compare them with the non-obese population. Design: Retrospective analysis. Patients and Methods: All patients who underwent elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery were included in the study. Patients operated on for emergency, palliative, and combined procedures were excluded. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I: body mass index (BMI) > 30 (Obese). Group II: BMI < 30 (Non-obese). Conversion rate, per-operative morbidity and mortality, recovery and length of hospital stay were assessed. Statistical analysis was performed using the Student t test and Chi-square test. Results: One hundred-forty-two patients were evaluated. There were 26 (18,3 per cent) in Group I and 116 (81,7 per cent) in Group II. There were no differences in operating time, recovery parameters, and postoperative complications between the groups. The conversion rate was 19 per cent in Group I and 16 per cent in Group II (P = NS) and the length of stay was 3 ± 1 days in Group I vs. 3,6 ± 2 days in Group II (P = NS). Conclusions: Laparoscopic colorectal surgery is feasible in obese patients, with the same benefits achieved in non-obese patients.